Great War forestry line, or a later incarnation as an Estate Railway - Glorious 12th specials and all that.What a great idea, and a lovely piece of wood.
Shame not to put a logging line on that......
Great War forestry line, or a later incarnation as an Estate Railway - Glorious 12th specials and all that.

Quite so - which is why I deliberately avoided any making any suggestion it was ripe for a resin pour and making it a little costal cove.Don't you just love these community builds![]()

Quite so - which is why I deliberately avoided any making any suggestion it was ripe for a resin pour and making it a little costal cove.![]()
What points are you using, Rob? I'm guessing either the "medium" (12" radius) or Setrack (9" radius) Peco.
The layout I showed with the Rapido wagons on it uses the Setrack points, but not everything plays well on them as they're dead frog. I haven't been able to try a Sirdar on them yet...
I remember seeing Roy Link's original, ¼" scale Crowsnest in Railway Modeller when that issue came out, it must have been one of the first micro-layouts, though they weren't called that then. Aside from railway modelling, at the time I was also making up and adding detail to the Matchbox 1:76 AFV kits with their little diorama bases; Crowsnest to me seemed to combine the two varieties of modelling.
Simon.

Quite so - which is why I deliberately avoided any making any suggestion it was ripe for a resin pour and making it a little costal cove.![]()
Don't you just love these community builds![]()

Billerbahn by Salisbury ASC, on FlickrUnfortunately, there's never as far as I know been a realistic prospect of finer 009 track from Peco, in the manner of the N gauge (and, latterly, TT:120) Code 55 with its double based rail...I remember some natter about it in the 1990s but it never came to anything. Some 009ers have used the N gauge Code 55 track, cutting out alternate sleepers which is doable as the track base is pretty robust, but it's a bit of a faff.Hi Simon.
I'm hoping to use one 'Y' point, a Peco SLE 497. I'm not keen on the Code 80 rail, and would prefer something lighter but I don't want to faff with building track etc so it is what it is.
I agree regarding Crowsnest. That's what attracted me to the idea of a really simplistic layout, which when you actually looked, Crowsnest was anything but, with each element being extremely well thought through and beautifully executed.
Rob