simond
Western Thunderer
I wondered about the zebra…I can't get my eyes off the tablecloth!
Looking good Rob.
Terry
I wondered about the zebra…I can't get my eyes off the tablecloth!
Looking good Rob.
Terry
Hi Rob
Can I ask why you dropped the idea of having a platform at the back?
Quite so - I remember seeing Barry Norman's Petherick when it was just track, plywood and white polystyrene at the Nottingham show.Nothing wrong with an unfinished layout going to a show - I've done so in the past. It lets the attendees see a layout in progress and allows you to talk about how you reached this stage, materials used and what comes next.
I respectfully disagree Dave. I have never been inspired by unfinished layouts at shows, and expecting visitors to pay to look at bare plywood always strikes me as a bit of a cheek. I have a wood merchants just five minutes drive away from home with the added bonus that they don't charge for entry!Nothing wrong with an unfinished layout going to a show - I've done so in the past. It lets the attendees see a layout in progress and allows you to talk about how you reached this stage, materials used and what comes next.
I respectfully disagree Dave. I have never been inspired by unfinished layouts at shows, and expecting visitors to pay to look at bare plywood always strikes me as a bit of a cheek. I have a wood merchants just five minutes drive away from home with the added bonus that they don't charge for entry!
There is also the problem of over exposure of a layout before it has even been completed. My previous club kept exhibiting a layout in various stages of construction. When eventually finished and shown as complete it drew comments such as "Oh, not that old thing again!"
Show me the completed layout to inspire me as to what I can achieve!
Terry
Apologies for a bit of thread hijack, but I think Copenhagen Fields would never be at the stage it is now if we had waited to exhibit it complete. There have always been finished sections and areas to be worked on. Admittedly, nowadays those are fairly hard to spot, but for a long while there were quite large areas of ‘Antelope brown’, for which we thank the forbearance of visitors. Equally, we take care not to over-expose the layout, whilst there is a type of viewer who looks out for what is new - it rarely attends consecutive shows in exactly the same condition.I respectfully disagree Dave. I have never been inspired by unfinished layouts at shows, and expecting visitors to pay to look at bare plywood always strikes me as a bit of a cheek. I have a wood merchants just five minutes drive away from home with the added bonus that they don't charge for entry!
There is also the problem of over exposure of a layout before it has even been completed. My previous club kept exhibiting a layout in various stages of construction. When eventually finished and shown as complete it drew comments such as "Oh, not that old thing again!"
Show me the completed layout to inspire me as to what I can achieve!
Terry

‘bit black over Will’s mother’s’…
Tim

That little chap looks very familiar . Thanks, MikeWell, a busy couple of weeks since the last post, and now into the week before SWAG, which is a week today in fact.
Next week will see me working Mon- Thursday at L&B and a quick refresh to Owl Lane, which got a bit damp loading at Nailsea. Nothing dramatic but a touch up is required here and there for the black paint as it is off to SWAG as a static display.
In the meantime, there are a few bits and bobs to attend to, including a spot of weathering ( first loco in something like 4 yrs ! ).
This little chap is just about done....
View attachment 261698
There is still a bit of tidying up here and there, along with the air tanks to re-attach.
Rob





That is nice to know.They are Dapol's new 517 0.4.2t and what little beauties they are. They run as well as they look thanks in no small part to the springing on one set of the drivers.
Outskirts of of a city, semi-suburban?
would be a change?
they do look rather nice.







Is it the same at the front of the loco?I have a question.......
Coupling the 517 up to a Rapido Evolution GWR Brake 3rd shows that the buffer height is lower on the 517.
View attachment 261937
Is this correct?
Comparing other locos against the coach, the buffer height matches, so the coach appears correct, certainly consistent with other stock.
Is the 517 simply a small loco ?
Rob
Is it the same at the front of the loco?